
No Use for a Name...back at it againNo Use for a Name...back at it againHere's what I'm thinkin for my next build (sketched these over dinner tonight-my gf hates bikes at this point lol) I've got two more stingrays to sacrifice. Not sure which one I'll go with-prolly a combination of the two. I might try it w rear suspension. I've also for a super moto downhill fork that I've been saving for something...this just might be it
![]() Last edited by Jgoodwill on Mon Jan 30, 2012 6:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: No Use for a Name...Man that would be sick! I'd go with a really high tank...
Re: No Use for a Name...
That's what I'm thinkin...I want the bars lower than the tank and headlight. The more I look at it, I think I'll do the bottom frame with the top fork setup. I might get started on it tonight
Re: No Use for a Name...Talk about a cool thumb nail sketch
I like what your thinking!... Looking forward to a progress report Chicago TailDraggers 2013
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Chicago- ... 8513381060
Re: No Use for a Name...
Lol
Re: No Use for a Name...Keep the bike(s), change GF (its gonna happen anyway, might as well get it over and take the pain now, it'll only be worse later).
So many bikes, so little time.......
Re: No Use for a Name...Lol-I feel ya man-I think I'll hang on to this one tho. Ok...been playing around with it and here's what I've narrowed it down to. Whadya think-A, B, or C??? I've got my fav, just curious what the general consensus is
![]()
Re: No Use for a Name...They're all cool, but I like B the best. I like the way the headlight is tucked back in on A and B, plus I like the shape of the tank better on B.
But really, any of those look good. I tried being serious, but it was boring.
Re: No Use for a Name...
I'm between B and C...I changed the tank on c to the same as B. Leanin' heavily toward C right now. Here are some color schemes I've been playing with. Leaning toward C on it too I think. ![]()
Re: No Use for a Name...With your changes, the attitude of the C is a little more aggressive than B, which has that 'laid back' fork rake. I think C might handle better as a bicycle and B as a motorcycle at speed. C just seems to be a little more 'in your face', and although it doesnt have quite the flow to my eye, I still like it for some reason.........
So many bikes, so little time.......
Re: No Use for a Name...
Agreed-C has been my fav all along...not sure why either. I think A has the best lines, but something about C just works for me. Heres what it'll be from the top ![]()
Re: No Use for a Name...I'm diggin the rides you guys are buildin! Can't wait to see this one!
It's Good to be the King!
Re: No Use for a Name...Hey man, I'm lovin' these designs! I like the way you're goin' with these things, right off the bat of those first lineups I was gonna suggest B with C's front end. I was wondering if you don't mind a little artistic input along with everyone elses help, cause I saw this and it instantly made me think of this.
(was gonna do some good editing but my compies actin funny so MS pain to the rescue! So I see these type builds and I Like em, but (not trying to offend ![]() I guess if I tried hard enough I could maybe cut and chop a couple of frames and maybe get something kinda like this, but I don't have the resources or ability to do a frame like this anywhere near as good as you probably could. Just thought I'd throw in some brain food for the effort. Keep up the sick work man! -Hans Last edited by SectionEightLife on Thu Dec 15, 2011 10:44 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Just remember.... No. 41 Chain
Re: No Use for a Name...
+1 Chicago TailDraggers 2013
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Chicago- ... 8513381060
Re: No Use for a Name...opppps. i thought this was the bands fan page
just messing with you.....looking forward to seeing something in steel
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: ctaccrusier, Onewheelsqueel, ZygoteLittle and 7 guests |
|